Legislature(1993 - 1994)

02/03/1994 01:34 PM House FIN

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
  HOUSE BILL NO. 231                                                           
                                                                               
       "An Act  relating to aggravating and mitigating factors                 
       at sentencing."                                                         
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                3                                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
  GEORGE  DOZIER,  STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE  PETE  KOTT explained                 
  that  CSHB  231  (JUD) modifies  an  aggravating  factor and                 
  establishes a mitigating factor  for purposes of presumptive                 
  sentencing.  He  noted that current  law provides that if  a                 
  defendant is convicted  of a sex  crime against a minor  and                 
  has  engaged  in the  same or  similar  conduct there  is an                 
  aggravating factor.  There is also  an aggravating factor if                 
  the defendant is convicted of  sexual assault and previously                 
  engaged in a  sexual assault.   There is not an  aggravating                 
  factor pertaining to  a defendant that has  committed sexual                 
  abuse of  a minor  and previously  committed sexual  assault                 
  against an adult.  Section 1 would add an aggravating factor                 
  if a defendant  is subject  to sentencing for  a felony  sex                 
  crime and has violated any other sexual crime statute.                       
                                                                               
  Mr. Dozier explained that a mitigating factor would be added                 
  when a defendant is being sentenced for a felony and a prior                 
  felony offense  has triggered a  presumptive sentence,  when                 
  the prior felony offense is of a less serious nature.                        
                                                                               
  Mr. Dozier  noted  that section  three which  referred to  a                 
  three  judge  panel  was  deleted  by  the  House  Judiciary                 
  Committee.                                                                   
                                                                               
  JAYNE ANDREN,  COUNCIL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE  AND SEXUAL ASSAULT                 
  spoke  in  support of  section 1  of  the legislation.   She                 
  suggested  that language be  added to section  2 to prohibit                 
  the mitigator in cases where the prior or current conviction                 
  concerns an offense covered by Alaska Statutes 11.41, Crimes                 
  Against Persons.                                                             
                                                                               
  CAREN  ROBINSON, ALASKA  NETWORK  ON DOMESTIC  VIOLENCE  AND                 
  SEXUAL ASSAULT  spoke in  support of  section 1.   She  also                 
  recommended that language be added to  section 2 to prohibit                 
  the mitigator in cases where the prior or current conviction                 
  concerns an offense  covered by Alaska Statutes 11.41.   She                 
  noted  that  AS 11.41  are  crimes of  murder, manslaughter,                 
  assault,   sexual  assault,   sexual  abuse   of  a   minor,                 
  kidnapping, and  other serious  crimes.   She observed  that                 
  charges may be pleaded down.                                                 
                                                                               
  Representative Brown referred to a  letter to Representative                 
  Kott from  the Alaska  Sentencing Commission, dated  3/25/94                 
  (copy  on file).  She noted  that the Commission recommended                 
  that  the  "legislative  history reflect  that  this  factor                 
  should  not  be applied  if  it would  reward  an escalating                 
  pattern of behavior or criminal career."                                     
                                                                               
  MARGOT KNUTH, CRIMINAL DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LAW suggested                 
  that  a intent  section could  be added to  the legislation.                 
  She noted  that if  the mitigator  is not  adopted, a  judge                 
  would have to send a case that do not compel the presumptive                 
                                                                               
                                4                                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
  sentence  to  a three  judge  panel.   She  argued  that the                 
  mitigator  would  allow the  judge's  discretion.   She gave                 
  examples of  cases  which would  trigger the  mitigator.   A                 
  first offense robbery of under $500  and a second offense of                 
  sexual assault would trigger the mitigator.                                  
                                                                               
  In response to a question  by Representative Therriault, Ms.                 
  Knuth noted  that the judge  can not reduce  the presumptive                 
  sentence by more  than half without  going to a three  judge                 
  panel.                                                                       
                                                                               
  Representative Brown provided members with AMENDMENT 1 (copy                 
  on file).  Amendment 1 would insert  on page 2, line 6 after                 
  "offense",  "unless  the prior  conviction  and  the present                 
  offense are violations of AS 11.41."                                         
                                                                               
  Ms. Knuth  pointed out that  the amendment would  pertain to                 
  more cases if the "and" is changed to "or".                                  
                                                                               
  (Tape Change, HFC 94-24, Side 1)                                             
                                                                               
  Representative   Hanley   noted  that,   under   the  second                 
  presumptive sentence mitigator, a presumptive sentence could                 
  be  reduced  to less  than  the  penalty of  the  first time                 
  offense.                                                                     
                                                                               
  CINDY SMITH, DIRECTOR,  ALASKA NETWORK ON  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE                 
  AND  SEXUAL  ASSAULT stated  that  mitigators should  not be                 
  allowed  in  cases involving  crimes  against persons.   She                 
  suggested that "or" would allow more cases to be exempt from                 
  the mitigator.                                                               
                                                                               
  Representative Brown elected to changed "and" to "or" before                 
  offering her  amendment.    Representative  Brown  MOVED  to                 
  ADOPT,  Amendment  1:    Insert  on  page 2,  line  6  after                 
  "offense",  "unless the  prior  conviction  or  the  present                 
  offense  are  violations of  AS  11.41."    There  being  NO                 
  OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                
                                                                               
  JERRY LUCKHAUPT, LEGAL  COUNSEL, LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS  AGENCY                 
  clarified that section  2 was  added at the  request of  the                 
  Alaska  Sentencing  Commission.    He  observed  that  under                 
  current law a  defendant convicted of  two class A  felonies                 
  would receive the same penalty as a defendant convicted of a                 
  class C first  offense and  a class  A second  offense.   He                 
  stressed that only class  A, B and C felonies  are included.                 
  Unclassified felonies are not included.                                      
                                                                               
  In response  to a  question by  Representative Navarre,  Mr.                 
  Luckhaupt  discussed  the burden  of  proof.   Mr. Luckhaupt                 
  questioned the rationale for a letter of intent.                             
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                5                                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
  Representative Brown suggested that the title should reflect                 
  the contents of the legislation.                                             
                                                                               
  Representative  Hanley  MOVED  to  delete  section  2.    He                 
  stressed that the option to receive less time than the first                 
  offense penalty should  not exist  under a mitigator  second                 
  felony offense.   Ms. Knuth  assured him  that a  reasonable                 
  judge would not  issue a  lesser penalty than  what a  first                 
  offense would require.  She added that additional mitigating                 
  factors  allow  judges  more flexibility.    She  noted that                 
  judges  can  send  cases to  a  three  judge  panel if  they                 
  question the presumptive sentence.                                           
                                                                               
  Co-Chair Larson OBJECTED to  the motion to delete section  2                 
  from CSHB  231 (JUD).   A roll  call vote  was taken  on the                 
  motion.                                                                      
                                                                               
  IN FAVOR: Brown,  Grussendorf,  Hoffman,   Navarre,  Foster,                 
                 Hanley, Martin, Therriault, MacLean                           
  OPPOSED:  Larson                                                             
                                                                               
  Representative Parnell was not present for the vote.                         
                                                                               
  The MOTION PASSED (9-1).                                                     
                                                                               
  Co-Chair Larson noted that  CSHB 231 (JUD) would be  HELD in                 
  Committee for  further discussion  in regards  to the  bills                 
  title.                                                                       

Document Name Date/Time Subjects